support@chatgptassignment.com
After studying Module 2: Lecture Materials & Resources, address the following in a well-written discussion post:
- One common dilemma faced by psychiatric nurse practitioners is determining who the “client” is. Given that children are typically brought for treatment by their parents, describe how the psychiatric nurse practitioner would respond to a child who discloses they are indulging in illicit behavior and asks you not to tell his or her parents.
Submission Instructions:
- Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
- You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
- All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
Discussion RubricCriteriaRatingsPointsIdentification of Main Issues, Problems, and ConceptsDistinguished – 4 points
Post is substantively accurate. Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Provides exceptional and thought-provoking analysis that directly addresses details and/or examples of the main topic.Excellent – 3 points
Post is mostly related to the topic. Demonstrates understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. It provides some supporting details and/or examples. Analyses not as clear as they could be.Fair – 1-2 points
Demonstrates limited understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. No details and/or examples are given.Poor – 0 points
Post is off-topic, incorrect and/or irrelevant to the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Analyses are not well organized or clear.4 pointsAPA Formatting GuidelinesDistinguished – 2 points
The reference page contains at least the required current scholarly academic reference and text reference. Follows APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.Excellent – 1 point
The reference page contains one current scholarly academic resource and text reference. Follows most APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.Fair – 0.5 points
The reference page contains one current or outdated scholarly academic resource. Many errors of APA guidelines: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.Poor – 0 points
The reference page contains no current scholarly academic resources, only internet web pages, or no reference page. Lack of APA guidelines for references provided or in-text citations.2 pointsWriting MechanicsDistinguished – 2 points
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.Excellent – 1 point
Few grammatical errors, but sentences could be clearer and more precise.Fair – 0.5 points
The paper contains a few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.Poor – 0 points
The paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.2 pointsResponse to Posts of PeersDistinguished – 2 points
Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each.Fair – 1 point
Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal.Poor – 0 points
Provided no response to a peer’s post.
2 pointsTotal Points 10