support@chatgptassignment.com
- Clinical Nurse Leader (CNL) Professional Activity Perspective
- After viewing a Nursing Leadership webinar of your choice, write a reflective essay of the webinar (must include: title page, 2-3 pages of content, and reference page, using APA format).
- Identify and cite the webinar you watched and provide a brief overview of the webinar content and purpose.
- Identify the population(s) discussed in the webinar.
- What value will this webinar bring to your new role as an RN and CNL? How will you apply the information you learned in the webinar to your clinical practice? Provide at least one specific example.
- What challenges for nursing leadership were discussed? How might these challenges be addressed?
- Which CNL competencies did the webinar most align with? Identify at least one specific CNL core competency using the CNL White Paper Download CNL White Paper(page 16, you must cite this source).
- Citation: American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) (2007). White paper on the education and role of the clinical nurse leader. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/ publications/white-papers/cnl/
- The Nursing Leadership webinar must be at least one hour in length.
- After viewing a Nursing Leadership webinar of your choice, write a reflective essay of the webinar (must include: title page, 2-3 pages of content, and reference page, using APA format).
- Free Nursing Leadership Webinar Resources:
- Tipton Nursing Leadership WebinarsLinks to an external site.
- Advancing Nursing through Nurse LeadershipLinks to an external site.
- American Nurse WebinarsLinks to an external site.
- Elite Learning Free Nursing Webinars for Healthcare ProfessionalsLinks to an external site.
While the above resources are available, you may choose any webinar that addresses nursing leadership.
Your assignment will be graded according to this rubric Class Online ROLES Assignment #1 Rubric.pdf Download Class Online ROLES Assignment #1 Rubric.pdf
Rubric
CNl Roles Assignment #1 Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAll Elements of Assignment Met (20% of Score)
10 to >8.9 pts
Meets All Expectations
All elements of the assignment are addressed thoroughly and comprehensively.
8.9 to >7.9 pts
Meets Most Expectations
All elements of the assignment are addressed adequately, most addressed comprehensively.
7.9 to >6.9 pts
Meets Some Expectations
All elements of the assignment addressed, but not addressed comprehensively.
6.9 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Elements of the Assignment not addressed or minimally addressed.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Content (20% of Score)
10 to >8.9 pts
Meets All Expectations
Rich in content and details with full development of thought; displays excellent understanding of topic. Uses relevant information in microsystem assessment. Factually correct, reflective, and substantive contribution.
8.9 to >7.9 pts
Meets Most Expectations
Content is substantial yet lacks detail and depth OR full development of concept/thought. Provides a moderate amount of insight, understanding, and reflective thought; provides original ideas.
7.9 to >6.9 pts
Meets Some Expectations
Incompletely explains ideas or does not effectively use supporting evidence. Provides only minimal understanding or reflective thought.
6.9 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Content is off-topic or irrelevant; presents information in a style which is inappropriate. Provides little to no understanding or reflective thought.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization (20% of Score)
10 to >9.0 pts
Meets All Expectations
Well organized paper. Transitions are clear and easy to follow. Uses a consistent organizational structure that groups related information.
9 to >7.9 pts
Meets Most Expectations
Transitions are present. Uses some organizational structure; information easy to follow.
7.9 to >6.9 pts
Meets Some Expectations
Loose organization. Uses a loosely defined organizational structure; weak transitions.
6.9 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
No consistent organizational structure or transitions; information is difficult to follow.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and Support (20% of Score)
10 to >9.0 pts
Meets All Expectations
Uses course material, personal/professional experiences, and other relevant information to support important points.
9 to >7.9 pts
Meets Most Expectations
Incorporates some references to course material and other supporting elements.
7.9 to >6.9 pts
Meets Some Expectations
Incorporates personal/professional experience but no references to course or other relevant material.
6.9 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Includes little to no references or supporting experience/evidence.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity and Writing Mechanics (20% of Score)
10 to >9.0 pts
Meets All Expectations
Excellent writing mechanics. Explains all ideas clearly and concisely with no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Adheres to all APA guidelines, format, and requirements.
9 to >7.9 pts
Meets Most Expectations
Satisfactory writing mechanics with only minor errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Closely follows APA guidelines and format with only minor errors.
7.9 to >6.9 pts
Meets Some Expectations
Some errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation and spelling which distract or impair readability. Some errors in APA citations or paper format.
6.9 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Fails to explain ideas clearly; numerous errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling which distract the reader and impair readability. Does not follow APA guidelines or format.
10 pts
Total Points: 50